This discussion has indeed developed quite nice and is not so weak in the level as it would have been too befurchten given the public debate.
A few notes on various topics (without quotes):
The thing about capitalism, pure and earlier it was all better!
What was the earlier? I mean before the end of the Soviet bloc. Since the economy was not so globalized, India and China were no giants on the go, but something much more important things was different. If Western societies were living under the pressure that caused the existence of as expansive militarist perceived communism as long as in the heads of the propaganda worked, the West was threatened from the east, there was in the west, even in the U.S. a defense alliance capitalists and social reformers.
By the end of this threat was suddenly a monstrous historical misrepresentation by - the staunch ideologues of capitalism explained types to sole victors, the social reformers pushed to the side and started the experiment, which in 2009 failed grouartig at the expense of ordinary people.
I have nothing against market economy and competition, both are in a reasonable quality of regulatory policy framework for better organization as a form incapable of command economy, but it is unleashed as a turbo-capitalism. The ideology is, just as Communism is an ideology. Unfortunately, the democracy of the West only in exceptional cases has proven to be at least partially resistant to the ideological hype, I think of as really only the Nordic consensus democracies, Germany in any case experienced a decline in morality in the labor market and the destruction of the social basis of an inclusive society.
May I snapped at an example?
The validity of a long-term protection of the social status of unemployment according to the standards of the 70s led to the workings of market forces in the area of simple labor. Just because not everyone had to accept workers made unemployed every work was necessary for those jobs that were tough and dirty or exotic in the hours, the market law of supply and demand. Say, an employer who wanted to have as busy a place had to offer a reasonable reward in, or was this work lie. was
With the gradual abolition of this assurance is made to the current situation in which the precarious ratios are increasingly becoming the norm. People no longer have the possibility to refuse to yield. There is power in the market, the power prevails. The very concept of a market but calls for the freedom of such power, calls the free market decision about participation. It is the core of the hypocrisy of the liberal ideology that blur the chattering addicts habit Lugner the market concept. It is not all market under a market concept which is occupied normative, What can be described as a market. Reference to market economic theory of form ...
By this stupid chatter explain simply, everything that happens in reality, be a good market economy of the theoretical model, they prevent the essential in a democracy actually carrying out the public discourse. And all this against a backdrop where there is a Berlusconi's television empire, an Austrian newspaper industry unit, a German BILD editorial or populist politicians like Bruderle, Seehofer, Blocher, the suffeltoten Haider and similar ilk.
What does this have to do with the euro?
The pricing of power in designated markets in monopoly, monopsony, oligopoly, Oligopsonen, is different than in the defined as the ideal Polypol-Polypson case. There is no causality, it is coincidence, the introduction of the euro coincided with a period is bad for changing market.
About It should also be pointed at something else was in the period preceding the introduction of the euro, about three years, a period of almost deflationary nature in which there were few price increases. The vendors were waiting for the introduction of the new currency, then right to strike. Also was the beginning of the track adjustable scarcity of resources by the rise of large economies of Asia as well in that time. These are all welfare-reducing factors for the Europeans, which can not but zuruckfuhren to maintaining change.
The Return to Gold respect
would be a folly. Money is essentially nothing more than confidence. Anyone who takes money instead of bartering operate, the trusts that money is just money.
Any normal Western man is confident that that is acceptable to his checking account getatigte Ьberweisung. It's been a bit of ware stood to have to each payment in the form of a bag of coins Ьbergabe accomplish.
But I assume that the geauuerten opinions on this point is aimed at maintaining a gold core, ie a system in which the commitment of the central bank to exchange at the request of bank notes in gold, is the basis of all payments. Of these, one is all over the world abgeruckt consensus, because this rule is a disability with no real benefit.
I have to repeat myself: The problem is not the respect, not the book money, the problem is a global financial market, which is controlled by criminal elements. Of course, the actions of criminals only in absolute exemptions are prosecuted, usually is these people with respect and met because they are rich indeed.
What is the Ьbel described? Economic activity leads to prosperity or should do it. Wertschopfung is a central concept. With the provision of services and the creation of products, created by the use of labor and the use of resources, something that the people is more valuable than the situation before. In the financial transactions of large values hardly be cropped. It will be changed opinions, but hardly created anything. The only causes a redistribution of the whole sum of the value creations through to the financial sharks. I see this as criminal, it's in my eyes nothing but the action of a thief or highwayman.
After all, has the introduction of the euro for Europe, the possibilities of these financial sharks RESTRICTED a little. Against the German mark Euroeinfuhrung lively rallies were driven against French Franc - Hurd is now this has become a little bit high, but still not high enough. The existence of the community preservation messenger but a better chance at a real restructuring of the global financial markets, but that is not wanted. There is a majority opinion, after which the kingdom is always right.
Wolfwlf Yours
Nude Mod 
